<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 719 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198018</link>
    <description>The SC partially allowed the appeals, permitting the appellants to charge interest at 15% per annum on the amount due during the stay period, reducing the originally deemed unconscionable rate of 20%. The appellants were directed to hand over possession of the house to the respondent upon payment of the principal and interest. The judgment concluded with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 719 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198018</link>
      <description>The SC partially allowed the appeals, permitting the appellants to charge interest at 15% per annum on the amount due during the stay period, reducing the originally deemed unconscionable rate of 20%. The appellants were directed to hand over possession of the house to the respondent upon payment of the principal and interest. The judgment concluded with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>