https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198015 The appellate court found the suit maintainable based on the deed of dissolution transferring rights to the appellant. It confirmed the sale was by the firm, rejecting challenges to marketable title and privity of contract. The court determined the balance purchase price was due upon the truck transfer date. The validity of the deed of dissolution was upheld, allowing the appellant to sue individually. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, directing respondent No. 1 to pay the appellant Rs. 20,000 with interest and costs. en-us Fri, 28 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:24:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198015 The appellate court found the suit maintainable based on the deed of dissolution transferring rights to the appellant. It confirmed the sale was by the firm, rejecting challenges to marketable title and privity of contract. The court determined the balance purchase price was due upon the truck transfer date. The validity of the deed of dissolution was upheld, allowing the appellant to sue individually. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, directing respondent No. 1 to pay the appellant Rs. 20,000 with interest and costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jun 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198015