https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198007 The Court held that the Family Court lacked jurisdiction to handle adoption matters under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. The Family Court's decision to regularize the adoption of a girl named Vijaya was set aside, as adoption disputes fall under civil jurisdiction, not within the purview of the Family Court. The Court emphasized its supervisory jurisdiction to correct errors when courts exceed their designated powers and overturned the Family Court's decision, deeming it legally invalid. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2018 13:09:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198007 The Court held that the Family Court lacked jurisdiction to handle adoption matters under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. The Family Court's decision to regularize the adoption of a girl named Vijaya was set aside, as adoption disputes fall under civil jurisdiction, not within the purview of the Family Court. The Court emphasized its supervisory jurisdiction to correct errors when courts exceed their designated powers and overturned the Family Court's decision, deeming it legally invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198007