<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (1) TMI 12 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198003</link>
    <description>Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended in 1939, was interpreted as applying to residents as well as non-residents because the opening words were framed broadly and the later reference to a person not resident in British India was treated as a specific subset, not a limitation. The marginal note &quot;Non-residents&quot; was held to be an unreliable guide to construction, and its later alteration supported the wider reading. The provision was also described as capable, in an appropriate case, of operating with the charging provisions and overriding the exemption otherwise available under Section 14(2)(c) where profits arose through a business connection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 12:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (1) TMI 12 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198003</link>
      <description>Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, as amended in 1939, was interpreted as applying to residents as well as non-residents because the opening words were framed broadly and the later reference to a person not resident in British India was treated as a specific subset, not a limitation. The marginal note &quot;Non-residents&quot; was held to be an unreliable guide to construction, and its later alteration supported the wider reading. The provision was also described as capable, in an appropriate case, of operating with the charging provisions and overriding the exemption otherwise available under Section 14(2)(c) where profits arose through a business connection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>