<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 950 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354214</link>
    <description>The court resolved the discrepancy in quantity but found the penalty imposed for the delayed journey start date unjustified. The petitioner was granted release of the goods and vehicle upon providing security equal to the goods&#039; value and tax payable in the form of an indemnity bond. Sri Prem Shankar Prasad was listed as counsel for the respondents in the next hearing scheduled for 24.01.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 950 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354214</link>
      <description>The court resolved the discrepancy in quantity but found the penalty imposed for the delayed journey start date unjustified. The petitioner was granted release of the goods and vehicle upon providing security equal to the goods&#039; value and tax payable in the form of an indemnity bond. Sri Prem Shankar Prasad was listed as counsel for the respondents in the next hearing scheduled for 24.01.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>