<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 949 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354213</link>
    <description>The court quashed the penalty and seizure orders in a case where goods were seized due to the absence of an E-Way Bill. The court found no evidence of tax evasion and noted the technical nature of the breach. Recognizing challenges in E-Way Bill procedures, the court ordered the immediate release of the petitioner&#039;s vehicle and goods, allowing the writ petition without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 949 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354213</link>
      <description>The court quashed the penalty and seizure orders in a case where goods were seized due to the absence of an E-Way Bill. The court found no evidence of tax evasion and noted the technical nature of the breach. Recognizing challenges in E-Way Bill procedures, the court ordered the immediate release of the petitioner&#039;s vehicle and goods, allowing the writ petition without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>