<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 38 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11518</link>
    <description>The court held that the land should be assessed as a long-term capital asset and the building as a short-term capital asset for capital gains tax purposes. The court ruled in favor of the assessees, affirming their entitlement to the benefits under sections 80T and 54E. The question referred was answered in the affirmative, in favor of the assessees and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 38 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11518</link>
      <description>The court held that the land should be assessed as a long-term capital asset and the building as a short-term capital asset for capital gains tax purposes. The court ruled in favor of the assessees, affirming their entitlement to the benefits under sections 80T and 54E. The question referred was answered in the affirmative, in favor of the assessees and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>