<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 947 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354211</link>
    <description>The applicant, a non-resident Indian, was held eligible for deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act for reinvesting capital gains from a property sale in New Delhi into a residential property in London. The Authority determined that the requirement to invest in a residential house &quot;in India&quot; was introduced through an amendment effective from 01.04.2015 and did not apply to the assessment year in question (AY 2012-13). The Authority relied on a judicial precedent from the Gujarat High Court to support the applicant&#039;s interpretation. The Authority also provided guidance on the computation of long-term capital gains, including indexation benefits and verification of valuation figures by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 947 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354211</link>
      <description>The applicant, a non-resident Indian, was held eligible for deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act for reinvesting capital gains from a property sale in New Delhi into a residential property in London. The Authority determined that the requirement to invest in a residential house &quot;in India&quot; was introduced through an amendment effective from 01.04.2015 and did not apply to the assessment year in question (AY 2012-13). The Authority relied on a judicial precedent from the Gujarat High Court to support the applicant&#039;s interpretation. The Authority also provided guidance on the computation of long-term capital gains, including indexation benefits and verification of valuation figures by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>