<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 944 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX), NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354208</link>
    <description>A foreign enterprise was found to have a fixed place permanent establishment in India because it had space at its disposal at the project venue, including storage and working space, and carried on continuous on-site operations for preparation, execution, maintenance and dismantling. The lighting and searchlight receipts were held not to be royalty or fees for included services because the customer received the turnkey output, not the underlying know-how or technical knowledge on a make available basis. As the permanent establishment existed, the project income was taxable in India as business profits attributable to that PE under the treaty and also fell within section 9(1)(i).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 944 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX), NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354208</link>
      <description>A foreign enterprise was found to have a fixed place permanent establishment in India because it had space at its disposal at the project venue, including storage and working space, and carried on continuous on-site operations for preparation, execution, maintenance and dismantling. The lighting and searchlight receipts were held not to be royalty or fees for included services because the customer received the turnkey output, not the underlying know-how or technical knowledge on a make available basis. As the permanent establishment existed, the project income was taxable in India as business profits attributable to that PE under the treaty and also fell within section 9(1)(i).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>