<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 935 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354199</link>
    <description>A recall of an ex parte tribunal order was refused where the record showed that hearing notices had been issued to the address furnished, were not returned unserved, and were supported by registered acknowledgements. A bare allegation of non-service, unsupported by reliable material, was insufficient to displace the documentary proof of service. The tribunal also found that the earlier order had been passed after hearing the Revenue and perusing the record, and no mistake apparent from the record or sufficient cause for recall was established. The miscellaneous applications were therefore dismissed and the earlier order left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 08:09:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 935 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354199</link>
      <description>A recall of an ex parte tribunal order was refused where the record showed that hearing notices had been issued to the address furnished, were not returned unserved, and were supported by registered acknowledgements. A bare allegation of non-service, unsupported by reliable material, was insufficient to displace the documentary proof of service. The tribunal also found that the earlier order had been passed after hearing the Revenue and perusing the record, and no mistake apparent from the record or sufficient cause for recall was established. The miscellaneous applications were therefore dismissed and the earlier order left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>