<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 934 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the Assessing Officer (A.O) to re-evaluate the disallowance of proportionate finance charges in light of the HDFC Bank Ltd. judgment. The disallowance of demat charges was upheld, and the restoration of disallowed administrative expenses for verification was affirmed. The final order was pronounced on 17.01.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 08:09:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 934 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by directing the Assessing Officer (A.O) to re-evaluate the disallowance of proportionate finance charges in light of the HDFC Bank Ltd. judgment. The disallowance of demat charges was upheld, and the restoration of disallowed administrative expenses for verification was affirmed. The final order was pronounced on 17.01.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>