<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 927 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354191</link>
    <description>The tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, treating the appellant&#039;s income from land transactions as business income rather than capital gains. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the tribunal finding no merit in invoking Section 50C. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 50C and penalty initiation. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was to be levied after adjustments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 927 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354191</link>
      <description>The tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, treating the appellant&#039;s income from land transactions as business income rather than capital gains. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the tribunal finding no merit in invoking Section 50C. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld, directing the deletion of additions made under Section 50C and penalty initiation. Interest under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D was to be levied after adjustments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>