https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354185 A contract dispute under arbitration law turned on alleged non-supply of DTC location lists, waiver, damages, and a belated amendment request. The court treated the finding that the appellant prevented performance by failing to furnish location lists as a factual finding not open to interference absent perversity, and upheld termination for fundamental breach. It rejected waiver, holding that commencement of work did not amount to abandonment of the contractual right to full location supply. The damages award was sustained as a compensation-based quantification within the arbitrators' domain and not contrary to public policy. The late chamber summons for amendment was also rejected. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2018 08:05:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354185 A contract dispute under arbitration law turned on alleged non-supply of DTC location lists, waiver, damages, and a belated amendment request. The court treated the finding that the appellant prevented performance by failing to furnish location lists as a factual finding not open to interference absent perversity, and upheld termination for fundamental breach. It rejected waiver, holding that commencement of work did not amount to abandonment of the contractual right to full location supply. The damages award was sustained as a compensation-based quantification within the arbitrators' domain and not contrary to public policy. The late chamber summons for amendment was also rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354185