https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354182 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess finished goods due to unaccounted production issues. However, goods produced during a trial run were liable for confiscation under Rule 25. The Tribunal reduced the excessive redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant, setting the new amounts at 20,00,000 and 10,00,000 respectively. The impugned order was modified, partially allowing the appeal. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354182 The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of excess finished goods due to unaccounted production issues. However, goods produced during a trial run were liable for confiscation under Rule 25. The Tribunal reduced the excessive redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant, setting the new amounts at 20,00,000 and 10,00,000 respectively. The impugned order was modified, partially allowing the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354182