https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354181 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the appellant operated as a job worker for M/s Zydus, applying Rule 10A for valuing the excisable goods based on the terms of the manufacturing agreement. The appellant's contention of a principal-to-principal transaction was rejected, and it was determined that the goods were manufactured exclusively for M/s Zydus as per the agreement, leading to the valuation based on M/s Zydus' selling price as required by Rule 10A. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354181 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that the appellant operated as a job worker for M/s Zydus, applying Rule 10A for valuing the excisable goods based on the terms of the manufacturing agreement. The appellant's contention of a principal-to-principal transaction was rejected, and it was determined that the goods were manufactured exclusively for M/s Zydus as per the agreement, leading to the valuation based on M/s Zydus' selling price as required by Rule 10A. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354181