<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 916 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354180</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the Original Authority to reexamine the case based on available evidence and submissions. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a consistent and thorough analysis of the facts to arrive at a conclusive decision. The case highlighted the importance of documentary evidence and the proper evaluation of statements in adjudicating matters related to central excise duty evasion and the establishment of dummy units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 07:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 916 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354180</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the Original Authority to reexamine the case based on available evidence and submissions. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a consistent and thorough analysis of the facts to arrive at a conclusive decision. The case highlighted the importance of documentary evidence and the proper evaluation of statements in adjudicating matters related to central excise duty evasion and the establishment of dummy units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>