<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 915 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that subsidy amounts received by the appellants under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme should not be included in the assessable value of goods for VAT liability calculation. The Tribunal found that the VAT amounts paid using subsidy funds through Challan Form 37B should be considered as actual payment of tax, leading to the setting aside of the impugned orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 915 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that subsidy amounts received by the appellants under the Rajasthan Investment Promotion Scheme should not be included in the assessable value of goods for VAT liability calculation. The Tribunal found that the VAT amounts paid using subsidy funds through Challan Form 37B should be considered as actual payment of tax, leading to the setting aside of the impugned orders and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>