<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 913 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of Cenvat Credit on Club or Association Service and Health and Fitness Service. It held that these services were used for business purposes, making them eligible for credit under the un-amended definition of input service. The Tribunal emphasized the inclusion of activities relating to business in the definition, citing consistency in bookkeeping across units. It distinguished previous cases cited by the Revenue, ruling that the disputed services directly supported business operations and employee welfare, qualifying as input services. The appellant was granted Cenvat Credit for the disputed services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 913 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the denial of Cenvat Credit on Club or Association Service and Health and Fitness Service. It held that these services were used for business purposes, making them eligible for credit under the un-amended definition of input service. The Tribunal emphasized the inclusion of activities relating to business in the definition, citing consistency in bookkeeping across units. It distinguished previous cases cited by the Revenue, ruling that the disputed services directly supported business operations and employee welfare, qualifying as input services. The appellant was granted Cenvat Credit for the disputed services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>