https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197996 The court clarified that cognizance was taken only once, on 21.06.2007, not twice as claimed by the appellant. Regarding amending a complaint, the court allowed the amendment to avoid multiple proceedings, citing precedents permitting amendments for correcting curable infirmities. The court upheld the Magistrate's decision to allow the amendment, emphasizing that no prejudice was caused to the appellant as summons had not been issued. The appeal was dismissed, directing the trial court to proceed promptly without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:27:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197996 The court clarified that cognizance was taken only once, on 21.06.2007, not twice as claimed by the appellant. Regarding amending a complaint, the court allowed the amendment to avoid multiple proceedings, citing precedents permitting amendments for correcting curable infirmities. The court upheld the Magistrate's decision to allow the amendment, emphasizing that no prejudice was caused to the appellant as summons had not been issued. The appeal was dismissed, directing the trial court to proceed promptly without expressing any opinion on the case's merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197996