<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1616 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197998</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed concerns regarding delay in communication of inquiry letter, bias of the Inquiry Officer, and non-furnishing of requested documents. The court restrained the Inquiry Officer from passing a final order, directed respondents&#039; counsel to obtain instructions promptly, and ordered relevant documents to be provided to the petitioner. The case was relisted for further proceedings to ensure a fair inquiry process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1616 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197998</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed concerns regarding delay in communication of inquiry letter, bias of the Inquiry Officer, and non-furnishing of requested documents. The court restrained the Inquiry Officer from passing a final order, directed respondents&#039; counsel to obtain instructions promptly, and ordered relevant documents to be provided to the petitioner. The case was relisted for further proceedings to ensure a fair inquiry process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>