https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197988 A Civil Court's finding on possession on reference under Section 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was treated as final, because the statute barred any appeal, review or revision against that finding. A Magistrate's order made in conformity with that final finding could not be reopened in revision under Sections 435 and 439, since revisional power cannot be used to indirectly challenge what the statute has made conclusive. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 remained available in principle, but only to keep subordinate courts within jurisdiction; it was not a basis for reappreciating evidence or correcting mere factual error. On the facts, no interference was justified. en-us Tue, 26 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:17:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197988 A Civil Court's finding on possession on reference under Section 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 was treated as final, because the statute barred any appeal, review or revision against that finding. A Magistrate's order made in conformity with that final finding could not be reopened in revision under Sections 435 and 439, since revisional power cannot be used to indirectly challenge what the statute has made conclusive. Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 remained available in principle, but only to keep subordinate courts within jurisdiction; it was not a basis for reappreciating evidence or correcting mere factual error. On the facts, no interference was justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197988