<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 681 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197986</link>
    <description>Revisional power under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act is limited to cases where the appellate authority, Land Board, or Taluk Land Board has erroneously decided, or failed to decide, a question of law. Mere non-consideration of relevant documents, even those bearing on tenancy, does not by itself constitute such an error. However, where factual findings are reached without considering material documents that could have altered the result, the High Court may still exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 alongside its revisional power. On that basis, the High Court was justified in setting aside the tribunal orders, and no interference was warranted in appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:55:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 681 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197986</link>
      <description>Revisional power under Section 103 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act is limited to cases where the appellate authority, Land Board, or Taluk Land Board has erroneously decided, or failed to decide, a question of law. Mere non-consideration of relevant documents, even those bearing on tenancy, does not by itself constitute such an error. However, where factual findings are reached without considering material documents that could have altered the result, the High Court may still exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 alongside its revisional power. On that basis, the High Court was justified in setting aside the tribunal orders, and no interference was warranted in appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>