https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197985 A statutory finality clause does not bar certiorari under Article 226 where the impugned order discloses an error of law apparent on the face of the record, but judicial review remains limited to patent legal error and does not permit substitution of the High Court's own factual findings. On the management-exemption question, the statutory tests required proof that the employee was in a managerial position, and the authority's finding that the appellant lacked powers of appointment, discipline, leave, independent expenditure, contracts, banking operations, policy making, or binding authority was upheld; the order was therefore not vitiated by apparent legal error. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:29:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197985 A statutory finality clause does not bar certiorari under Article 226 where the impugned order discloses an error of law apparent on the face of the record, but judicial review remains limited to patent legal error and does not permit substitution of the High Court's own factual findings. On the management-exemption question, the statutory tests required proof that the employee was in a managerial position, and the authority's finding that the appellant lacked powers of appointment, discipline, leave, independent expenditure, contracts, banking operations, policy making, or binding authority was upheld; the order was therefore not vitiated by apparent legal error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197985