https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197984 The Supreme Court held that compliance with Sections 64, 65, and 66 was not a prerequisite for the Registrar's action under Section 72 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the Registrar could form an opinion based on various sources and that the High Court had exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with the Registrar's orders under Article 226. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the Registrar's authority to act under Section 72 without prior adherence to Sections 64, 65, and 66. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:16:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197984 The Supreme Court held that compliance with Sections 64, 65, and 66 was not a prerequisite for the Registrar's action under Section 72 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that the Registrar could form an opinion based on various sources and that the High Court had exceeded its jurisdiction by interfering with the Registrar's orders under Article 226. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court's judgment, and dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the Registrar's authority to act under Section 72 without prior adherence to Sections 64, 65, and 66. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197984