https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197984 Section 72 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act did not require the Registrar to first resort to audit, inquiry or inspection under sections 64 to 66, or to afford prior rectification of defects, because those procedures were not made conditions precedent and the Registrar only needed to form an honest opinion on relevant material. The High Court's Article 226 jurisdiction was confined to judicial review and did not permit reappraisal of the facts or substitution of its own view for the Registrar's assessment. On the stated facts, no jurisdictional or legal infirmity was shown, so the supersession orders were upheld and the writ petitions were dismissed. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:16:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197984 Section 72 of the Madras Co-operative Societies Act did not require the Registrar to first resort to audit, inquiry or inspection under sections 64 to 66, or to afford prior rectification of defects, because those procedures were not made conditions precedent and the Registrar only needed to form an honest opinion on relevant material. The High Court's Article 226 jurisdiction was confined to judicial review and did not permit reappraisal of the facts or substitution of its own view for the Registrar's assessment. On the stated facts, no jurisdictional or legal infirmity was shown, so the supersession orders were upheld and the writ petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197984