https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197982 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and decree. The decree passed by the Small Causes Court was restored, with the respondent ordered to pay the costs of the appellants. The Court clarified the applicability of Section 5(11)(c) of the Act to only residential premises, not business premises, and emphasized the strict compliance required under Section 12(3)(b) for tenant protection. Additionally, the Court criticized the High Court's interference with the Small Causes Court's discretion under Article 227 of the Constitution. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 16:46:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197982 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's judgment and decree. The decree passed by the Small Causes Court was restored, with the respondent ordered to pay the costs of the appellants. The Court clarified the applicability of Section 5(11)(c) of the Act to only residential premises, not business premises, and emphasized the strict compliance required under Section 12(3)(b) for tenant protection. Additionally, the Court criticized the High Court's interference with the Small Causes Court's discretion under Article 227 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197982