https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197979 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot override an express statutory bar on appeal or revision against interlocutory orders. Where a special enactment preserves the challenge for a statutory appeal against the final judgment before a two-Judge Bench, High Court intervention cannot operate as a substitute for that appellate route. Inherent power is unavailable where the special statute provides a specific remedy and no abuse of process or immediate miscarriage of justice is demonstrated. Errors in an interlocutory order may be raised in the pending statutory appeal, without prejudice to the parties. en-us Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:56:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197979 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot override an express statutory bar on appeal or revision against interlocutory orders. Where a special enactment preserves the challenge for a statutory appeal against the final judgment before a two-Judge Bench, High Court intervention cannot operate as a substitute for that appellate route. Inherent power is unavailable where the special statute provides a specific remedy and no abuse of process or immediate miscarriage of justice is demonstrated. Errors in an interlocutory order may be raised in the pending statutory appeal, without prejudice to the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197979