https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197979 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot be used to bypass an express statutory bar on appeal or revision against an interlocutory order. Where the special enactment preserves challenge to such an order in the statutory appeal against the final judgment, the High Court should not interfere unless there is demonstrated abuse of process or immediate miscarriage of justice. The article notes that the interlocutory grievance could be raised in the pending statutory appeal without prejudice, so the impugned interference was not justified and the statutory appellate scheme had to be respected. en-us Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:56:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197979 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 cannot be used to bypass an express statutory bar on appeal or revision against an interlocutory order. Where the special enactment preserves challenge to such an order in the statutory appeal against the final judgment, the High Court should not interfere unless there is demonstrated abuse of process or immediate miscarriage of justice. The article notes that the interlocutory grievance could be raised in the pending statutory appeal without prejudice, so the impugned interference was not justified and the statutory appellate scheme had to be respected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197979