https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197978 The court granted leave to the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings and heard the motion. The plaintiffs sought an injunction against the defendants for passing off their business using the domain name "RADIFF" to mislead the public. Additionally, the plaintiffs alleged copyright infringement. Despite the defendants' argument that confusion was unlikely due to the nature of Internet access, the court found in favor of the plaintiffs. Citing established principles of passing off and the importance of protecting domain names, the court granted the injunction, restraining the defendants from using "RADIFF" and related reliefs. en-us Thu, 22 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:55:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197978 The court granted leave to the plaintiffs to amend their pleadings and heard the motion. The plaintiffs sought an injunction against the defendants for passing off their business using the domain name "RADIFF" to mislead the public. Additionally, the plaintiffs alleged copyright infringement. Despite the defendants' argument that confusion was unlikely due to the nature of Internet access, the court found in favor of the plaintiffs. Citing established principles of passing off and the importance of protecting domain names, the court granted the injunction, restraining the defendants from using "RADIFF" and related reliefs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197978