<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 901 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354165</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the decision on prosecution timing is within the authorities&#039; discretion. The court highlighted the absence of a statutory requirement for a hearing before prosecution initiation, emphasizing that assessing offenses and deciding on prosecution are the authorities&#039; responsibilities. The judgment underscored the need for due process in prosecution decisions and refrained from opining on the Black Money Act&#039;s applicability to the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:18:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 901 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354165</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the decision on prosecution timing is within the authorities&#039; discretion. The court highlighted the absence of a statutory requirement for a hearing before prosecution initiation, emphasizing that assessing offenses and deciding on prosecution are the authorities&#039; responsibilities. The judgment underscored the need for due process in prosecution decisions and refrained from opining on the Black Money Act&#039;s applicability to the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>