<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 894 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354158</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the show cause notice lacked a specific charge against the assessee, following the precedent that a clear charge is necessary for sustaining a penalty. The decision emphasized the importance of informing the assessee properly and providing an opportunity to respond to any proposed penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 894 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354158</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal found that the show cause notice lacked a specific charge against the assessee, following the precedent that a clear charge is necessary for sustaining a penalty. The decision emphasized the importance of informing the assessee properly and providing an opportunity to respond to any proposed penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>