<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 886 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354150</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act. ITAT held that assessing the same income individually after AOP assessment would result in impermissible double taxation, citing legal precedents and emphasizing that income should only be assessed once, either individually or in the AOP&#039;s hands, to avoid such duplication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 886 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354150</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act. ITAT held that assessing the same income individually after AOP assessment would result in impermissible double taxation, citing legal precedents and emphasizing that income should only be assessed once, either individually or in the AOP&#039;s hands, to avoid such duplication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>