<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 885 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354149</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the transfer pricing addition in the Software development segment, remitting the matter for fresh determination of arm&#039;s length price (ALP) after excluding three companies from the comparables list. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c), as it found the assessee had acted in good faith and with due diligence in applying the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) in accordance with Section 92C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 885 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354149</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the transfer pricing addition in the Software development segment, remitting the matter for fresh determination of arm&#039;s length price (ALP) after excluding three companies from the comparables list. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c), as it found the assessee had acted in good faith and with due diligence in applying the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) in accordance with Section 92C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>