<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 875 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354139</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, compounding the alleged offences under section 159 of the Companies Act, 1956. The ROC was directed to communicate the compounding fees to the appellant, to be deposited within six weeks. The ROC was further instructed to withdraw the pending complaint, clarifying that the compounding would not hinder ongoing investigations by SFIO or other legal proceedings against the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 875 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354139</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, compounding the alleged offences under section 159 of the Companies Act, 1956. The ROC was directed to communicate the compounding fees to the appellant, to be deposited within six weeks. The ROC was further instructed to withdraw the pending complaint, clarifying that the compounding would not hinder ongoing investigations by SFIO or other legal proceedings against the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>