<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 874 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354138</link>
    <description>A winding-up petition may be admitted where liability is admitted and the dispute is confined to quantification or currency conversion, because a mere disagreement over the exact amount due does not amount to a bona fide and substantial dispute. Here, the controversy was limited to whether payment had to be made in Swiss francs or Indian rupees and the applicable exchange rate, while the debt itself was not genuinely denied. The record also showed failure to clear the admitted dues despite notice and opportunity, supporting the finding that the company was unable to meet the liability. The objection based only on quantification was rejected and winding-up proceedings were set in motion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 874 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354138</link>
      <description>A winding-up petition may be admitted where liability is admitted and the dispute is confined to quantification or currency conversion, because a mere disagreement over the exact amount due does not amount to a bona fide and substantial dispute. Here, the controversy was limited to whether payment had to be made in Swiss francs or Indian rupees and the applicable exchange rate, while the debt itself was not genuinely denied. The record also showed failure to clear the admitted dues despite notice and opportunity, supporting the finding that the company was unable to meet the liability. The objection based only on quantification was rejected and winding-up proceedings were set in motion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>