<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 872 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354136</link>
    <description>The High Court granted the petitioner the right to appeal before CESTAT on certain aspects of the order-in-original, while directing the petitioner to address all issues before CESTAT except for specific directions under challenge. The Court emphasized the need to avoid piecemeal examination and highlighted the requirement of pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed without dismissal based solely on pre-deposit grounds. The Court also permitted the petitioner to file an amendment application to challenge specific directions under dispute within a specified timeframe. The writ petition was disposed of without commenting on the merits, leaving CESTAT to independently examine the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 872 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354136</link>
      <description>The High Court granted the petitioner the right to appeal before CESTAT on certain aspects of the order-in-original, while directing the petitioner to address all issues before CESTAT except for specific directions under challenge. The Court emphasized the need to avoid piecemeal examination and highlighted the requirement of pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed without dismissal based solely on pre-deposit grounds. The Court also permitted the petitioner to file an amendment application to challenge specific directions under dispute within a specified timeframe. The writ petition was disposed of without commenting on the merits, leaving CESTAT to independently examine the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>