<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 865 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354129</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act requires a reasonable and effective opportunity before reversal of input tax credit, tax determination, and penalty under Section 27(3). A notice merely inviting the dealer to appear on any working day is insufficient if the authority does not first consider the objections, apply its mind to the explanation, or deal with refund-related materials. Reliance on Section 13(1)(c) without first calling for the certificate was also improper. The reassessment order was therefore unsustainable for breach of natural justice, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after hearing the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:16:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 865 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354129</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu VAT Act requires a reasonable and effective opportunity before reversal of input tax credit, tax determination, and penalty under Section 27(3). A notice merely inviting the dealer to appear on any working day is insufficient if the authority does not first consider the objections, apply its mind to the explanation, or deal with refund-related materials. Reliance on Section 13(1)(c) without first calling for the certificate was also improper. The reassessment order was therefore unsustainable for breach of natural justice, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after hearing the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>