<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1338 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197973</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal due to an extraordinary delay of 278 days in filing, despite the appellant&#039;s explanation citing delays in a related matter and typing issues. The court held that waiting for the decision of the ITAT did not justify the delay under the Income Tax Act. The court found the reasons insufficient for condonation, emphasizing that parties often file appeals without waiting for ITAT decisions. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the importance of timely filing and valid justifications for delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1338 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197973</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal due to an extraordinary delay of 278 days in filing, despite the appellant&#039;s explanation citing delays in a related matter and typing issues. The court held that waiting for the decision of the ITAT did not justify the delay under the Income Tax Act. The court found the reasons insufficient for condonation, emphasizing that parties often file appeals without waiting for ITAT decisions. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the importance of timely filing and valid justifications for delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>