<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 33 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11499</link>
    <description>Rural agricultural land situated in the Union Territory of Delhi was held to fall within the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court applied its earlier ruling on the same provision and confirmed that capital gains arising from transfer of such rural agricultural land are chargeable to tax. The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 33 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11499</link>
      <description>Rural agricultural land situated in the Union Territory of Delhi was held to fall within the definition of capital asset under section 2(14)(iii)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court applied its earlier ruling on the same provision and confirmed that capital gains arising from transfer of such rural agricultural land are chargeable to tax. The issue was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>