<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (5) TMI 125 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197961</link>
    <description>An order of termination was upheld where the General Manager had approved and initialled the draft, because initials were sufficient authentication absent any rule requiring a full signature. Termination for unsatisfactory service record under a standing order permitting discharge simpliciter was held not to be punitive merely because reasons were stated in writing; it did not amount to a misconduct-based penalty requiring a domestic enquiry. Even assuming an enquiry was necessary, the employer was permitted to justify the action before the Labour Court by leading evidence, and the termination was sustained on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (5) TMI 125 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197961</link>
      <description>An order of termination was upheld where the General Manager had approved and initialled the draft, because initials were sufficient authentication absent any rule requiring a full signature. Termination for unsatisfactory service record under a standing order permitting discharge simpliciter was held not to be punitive merely because reasons were stated in writing; it did not amount to a misconduct-based penalty requiring a domestic enquiry. Even assuming an enquiry was necessary, the employer was permitted to justify the action before the Labour Court by leading evidence, and the termination was sustained on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>