<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1074 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197957</link>
    <description>The registry&#039;s memo of costs, prepared from the record and verified by the concerned Assistant Registrar/Administrative Officer (Judicial), was accepted, and the suit costs were taxed accordingly. The court approved the office calculation on the material available on record and directed taxation of costs in the stated amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:22:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1074 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197957</link>
      <description>The registry&#039;s memo of costs, prepared from the record and verified by the concerned Assistant Registrar/Administrative Officer (Judicial), was accepted, and the suit costs were taxed accordingly. The court approved the office calculation on the material available on record and directed taxation of costs in the stated amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>