https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197947 Temporary injunction protecting registered patent and design rights was upheld where the interlocutory challenge rested on disputed title, assignment formalities, and registration objections that required evidence and did not displace the respondent's prima facie ownership. The court treated the design validity challenge as insufficient because the record showed visible design features and no clear basis to say the registrations covered only functional or mechanical elements. It also rejected the plea that the patents were merely workshop improvements, and found no substantiated defence of acquiescence, estoppel, delay, laches, or non-working. Prima facie infringement and patent monopoly supported interim protection. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:27:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197947 Temporary injunction protecting registered patent and design rights was upheld where the interlocutory challenge rested on disputed title, assignment formalities, and registration objections that required evidence and did not displace the respondent's prima facie ownership. The court treated the design validity challenge as insufficient because the record showed visible design features and no clear basis to say the registrations covered only functional or mechanical elements. It also rejected the plea that the patents were merely workshop improvements, and found no substantiated defence of acquiescence, estoppel, delay, laches, or non-working. Prima facie infringement and patent monopoly supported interim protection. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 07 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197947