https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197944 Judicial review of a specialised tribunal's interlocutory orders is narrow, and interference under Articles 226 and 227 lies only where the order is perverse, materially irregular, or breaches natural justice. Applying settled injunction principles, the High Court accepted that TDSAT could restrain an erstwhile agent from falsely holding out authority for the broadcaster while declining interim relief that would effectively restore a terminated contractual relationship. The Court noted that the dispute arose from termination of agency and distribution arrangements, the claimed losses were capable of quantification in damages, and the balance of convenience was plausibly assessed by TDSAT. No ground was found to disturb the interim arrangements. en-us Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:03:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197944 Judicial review of a specialised tribunal's interlocutory orders is narrow, and interference under Articles 226 and 227 lies only where the order is perverse, materially irregular, or breaches natural justice. Applying settled injunction principles, the High Court accepted that TDSAT could restrain an erstwhile agent from falsely holding out authority for the broadcaster while declining interim relief that would effectively restore a terminated contractual relationship. The Court noted that the dispute arose from termination of agency and distribution arrangements, the claimed losses were capable of quantification in damages, and the balance of convenience was plausibly assessed by TDSAT. No ground was found to disturb the interim arrangements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197944