https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197943 Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 bars a second appeal from an appellate order, but it does not expressly exclude revisional jurisdiction. The appellate authority acting under the local Khasi and Jaintia Hills Rules was treated as a civil court subordinate to the High Court, so Rule 36A could be read consistently with the limited supervisory scope of revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The absence of a second appeal did not eliminate revision, and the local rule could not expand jurisdiction beyond the statutory scheme. The revision petition was therefore maintainable. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:55:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197943 Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 bars a second appeal from an appellate order, but it does not expressly exclude revisional jurisdiction. The appellate authority acting under the local Khasi and Jaintia Hills Rules was treated as a civil court subordinate to the High Court, so Rule 36A could be read consistently with the limited supervisory scope of revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The absence of a second appeal did not eliminate revision, and the local rule could not expand jurisdiction beyond the statutory scheme. The revision petition was therefore maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197943