<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 11 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11493</link>
    <description>The court rejected the reference application, emphasizing the factual determination of the supplementary partnership deed&#039;s authenticity and manipulation, rather than delving into legal interpretations of partnership and tax laws. The decision underscored the importance of factual evidence over legal arguments in resolving the issues raised by the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 11 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11493</link>
      <description>The court rejected the reference application, emphasizing the factual determination of the supplementary partnership deed&#039;s authenticity and manipulation, rather than delving into legal interpretations of partnership and tax laws. The decision underscored the importance of factual evidence over legal arguments in resolving the issues raised by the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>