<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 781 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197933</link>
    <description>A demand passed without affording the affected party a hearing was held vulnerable for breach of natural justice, and that defect was treated as an exception to the rule requiring exhaustion of alternate remedies. The court also noted that the jurisdictional question whether trade exhibitions fall within the statutory expression &quot;entertainment&quot; had not been decided by the authority after hearing the petitioner. In these circumstances, the demand could not stand in its existing form, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration with a reasoned speaking order after hearing the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 13:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 781 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197933</link>
      <description>A demand passed without affording the affected party a hearing was held vulnerable for breach of natural justice, and that defect was treated as an exception to the rule requiring exhaustion of alternate remedies. The court also noted that the jurisdictional question whether trade exhibitions fall within the statutory expression &quot;entertainment&quot; had not been decided by the authority after hearing the petitioner. In these circumstances, the demand could not stand in its existing form, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration with a reasoned speaking order after hearing the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>