https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197922 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh Acts, rejecting challenges based on fundamental rights violations. The Acts were protected under the Ninth Schedule and Articles 31-A and 31-B. Compensation principles were deemed adequate, and the acquisition for public purposes was affirmed. Procedural compliance under Article 31(3) was considered sufficient, and delegation of legislative functions to the executive was upheld. Specific objections to certain provisions were found to be within legislative competence and serving public purposes. en-us Fri, 02 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:44:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197922 The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh Acts, rejecting challenges based on fundamental rights violations. The Acts were protected under the Ninth Schedule and Articles 31-A and 31-B. Compensation principles were deemed adequate, and the acquisition for public purposes was affirmed. Procedural compliance under Article 31(3) was considered sufficient, and delegation of legislative functions to the executive was upheld. Specific objections to certain provisions were found to be within legislative competence and serving public purposes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 May 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197922