<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 812 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197920</link>
    <description>Interim mandatory injunction is a discretionary remedy that requires a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury; it is generally confined to preserving or restoring the last non-contested status. In a commercial contract dispute, questions about termination, breach, and possession should ordinarily be left for trial rather than resolved finally at the interlocutory stage. The High Court was said to have treated disputed issues as if deciding the suit and did not adequately address the trial court&#039;s findings or any clear irreparable injury, so its interim mandatory injunction and restoration of possession were set aside and the refusal of interim relief was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:01:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 812 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197920</link>
      <description>Interim mandatory injunction is a discretionary remedy that requires a strong prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury; it is generally confined to preserving or restoring the last non-contested status. In a commercial contract dispute, questions about termination, breach, and possession should ordinarily be left for trial rather than resolved finally at the interlocutory stage. The High Court was said to have treated disputed issues as if deciding the suit and did not adequately address the trial court&#039;s findings or any clear irreparable injury, so its interim mandatory injunction and restoration of possession were set aside and the refusal of interim relief was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>