<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 682 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197919</link>
    <description>Liquidation-balance distribution under the cited Companies Act provisions includes every secured creditor, rather than only first-charge holders, alongside workers. Priority disputes between first- and second-charge creditors may require separate adjustment under the Transfer of Property Act and do not exclude second-charge creditors at the disbursement stage. Affidavits and supporting materials submitted to the Official Liquidator to substantiate claims do not amount to relinquishment of security. Disbursement may follow the Chartered Accountant&#039;s final apportionment, while the amount attributable to ICICI Bank remains retained and invested in a fixed deposit pending further directions concerning bank substitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 09:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 682 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197919</link>
      <description>Liquidation-balance distribution under the cited Companies Act provisions includes every secured creditor, rather than only first-charge holders, alongside workers. Priority disputes between first- and second-charge creditors may require separate adjustment under the Transfer of Property Act and do not exclude second-charge creditors at the disbursement stage. Affidavits and supporting materials submitted to the Official Liquidator to substantiate claims do not amount to relinquishment of security. Disbursement may follow the Chartered Accountant&#039;s final apportionment, while the amount attributable to ICICI Bank remains retained and invested in a fixed deposit pending further directions concerning bank substitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>