<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354119</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amount of Rs. 46,94,62,365 was an actual write-off and not a provision for diminution in the value of investments. The ITAT concluded that the amount should not be added back to the book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the departmental appeal was dismissed, and the addition made by the AO was deleted, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 08:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 855 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354119</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the amount of Rs. 46,94,62,365 was an actual write-off and not a provision for diminution in the value of investments. The ITAT concluded that the amount should not be added back to the book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the departmental appeal was dismissed, and the addition made by the AO was deleted, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>