https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354093 A supplementary complaint based on further investigation was held maintainable with leave of the Court where it places additional material from the same transaction before the court. Cognizance is of the offence, not the offender, so no fresh cognizance was required when the supplementary complaint merely supplemented the existing case; the 2 August 2017 order was not illegal. However, after cognizance, remand under Section 309 CrPC had to be by a judicial order, and a reader's administrative noting on 11 August 2017 was not a valid remand. The custody from 11 August 2017 to 31 August 2017 was therefore unlawful, entitling the petitioner to bail. en-us Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354093 A supplementary complaint based on further investigation was held maintainable with leave of the Court where it places additional material from the same transaction before the court. Cognizance is of the offence, not the offender, so no fresh cognizance was required when the supplementary complaint merely supplemented the existing case; the 2 August 2017 order was not illegal. However, after cognizance, remand under Section 309 CrPC had to be by a judicial order, and a reader's administrative noting on 11 August 2017 was not a valid remand. The custody from 11 August 2017 to 31 August 2017 was therefore unlawful, entitling the petitioner to bail. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 16 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354093