<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 820 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant must include the amortized value of patterns in the assessable value for excise duty. This decision was based on the provisions of the Central Excise Act, the Mutual Industries Ltd case precedent, and relevant Board Circulars. The appellant&#039;s argument that the entire cost was already accounted for in the initial order was rejected, emphasizing the ongoing value of the patterns beyond the estimated units produced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=504976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 820 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant must include the amortized value of patterns in the assessable value for excise duty. This decision was based on the provisions of the Central Excise Act, the Mutual Industries Ltd case precedent, and relevant Board Circulars. The appellant&#039;s argument that the entire cost was already accounted for in the initial order was rejected, emphasizing the ongoing value of the patterns beyond the estimated units produced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=354084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>